Skip to content
How Copytrack’s bot wrongly accused US White House photographer of stealing a photo clicked by himself

News -

How Copytrack’s bot wrongly accused US White House photographer of stealing a photo clicked by himself

Former United States’ White House photographer Pete Souza had been threatened with copyright litigation for publishing a photo he took of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on his personal website. However, it was later revealed that the takedown notice was erroneously sent by the software bot of a copyright tracking firm.

The photo in question was taken by Mr Souza while onboard Air Force One in 2009 on Mr Obama’s first overseas trip as president. He added it to a photo gallery on his site after departing from the White House in 2017.

In an Instagram post, Mr Souza informed his 3.1 million followers that Copytrack, a company that assists photographers in identifying copyright violations, had notified him of a copyright infringement on behalf of WENN Rights International, claiming ownership of the image.

Souza was told that he was “legally obligated to compensate for the damage caused by this copyright infringement.”

He explained the story behind the image and claimed that he “made this photograph” and it is in the “public domain,” so they aren’t protected by copyright.

However, WENN CEO Lloyd Beiny later clarified that the takedown notice was an error.

Beiny explained: “Most photo agencies, including WENN, get sent PR photos from numerous organizations who appreciate their images being distributed to media outlets on their behalf. It would appear that is what occurred in this instance.”

Souza is not the first person to face legal repercussions for exploiting one of his own photos that are in the public domain. Getty has faced a US$1 billion lawsuit as a result of complaints about the inclusion of free photos in their paid library. Carol Highsmith received a takedown notice from the photo agency for her own images that she had donated to the Library of Congress.

Although there are a number of companies that share Copytrack's business model and charge a fee to search the internet for instances of copyright-protected photographs being used without permission, these businesses are seen unfavorably because of their tough approach against naive infringers. Dreamstime, however, is one of the players using a different strategy. It aims to be more educational in nature as opposed to others which place more emphasis on trying to negotiate large compensation from alleged infringers.

PitchMark helps innovators deter idea theft, so that third-parties that they share their idea with get the idea but don’t take it. Visit PitchMark.net and register for free as a PitchMark member today.

Topics

Categories

Contacts

Mark Laudi

Mark Laudi

Press contact Managing Partner (+65) 6223 2249

Related content

Image from Chi Modu Instagram account

Copyright holder of Biggie Smalls’ photos is being sued for unlawfully offering to sell products bearing his image and likeness

Heirs of hip-hop photographer Chi Modu and rapper Christopher Wallace, a.k.a. Biggie Smalls, are entangled in a legal battle since Modu started using his 1996 Biggie Smalls’ copyright-protected photo for a snowboard deal with a Swiss company.
Biggie’s estate, Notorious BIG LLC, has recently accused Modu of using the “rapper’s likeness” and licensing it for use on “snowboards, t-shirts, shower

Photo from Stig Havard Dirdal Instagram Account

Rip-off or not: Makers of Russian movie Yolki 8 accused of copying "human Christmas tree" photo concept

Social media is filled with photos and videos used by people who do not seek permission from the original creators. Most recently, for example, a Russian production house was pinpointed as having copied the original concept of a photographer without bothering to tweak the original concept even slightly.
In December 2015, photographer Stig Havard Dirdal was hired by the Norwegian camera store St

Photographer sues plastic surgeon for using her photos without permission beyond allotted time period

Photographer sues plastic surgeon for using her photos without permission beyond allotted time period

A plastic surgeon in Texas is being sued for copyright infringement after it was alleged that the doctor kept utilizing the images taken by a photographer even though her permission to do so had expired.
The lawsuit alleges that Houston-based Camille G. Cash twice paid photographer Sinden Collier to shoot pictures of her in 2007 and 2012.
Collier consented to provide Cash a license so that

Let your clients get the idea, without taking it.

PitchMark deters idea theft and provides you with options if it happens.

PitchMark protects the expression of your original concepts, designs, proposals, business plans, creative pitches, music - in short, any idea that you conceived and published, and claim as your own. It gives you peace-of-mind by signalling to whoever you share it with that you are its creator, and that you wish to be respected as such.

If you receive or evaluate ideas or pitches, join PitchMark as a sign of your commitment to respect the Intellectual Property rights of their creators. Attract more in-depth pitches from a wider range of sources. Highlight your PitchMark membership in your Sustainability or CSR Report.

PitchMark