News - 1 December 2022 10:00

How AI-generated artwork may jeopardize original artists’ creations

The discussion surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) art is developing quickly. In recent months, an AI-generated image took first prize at a fine art competition, an exhibition of DALL-E 2-produced artwork opened in a museum, and an artist registered a work she created using an AI generator with the US Copyright Office.

In September, New York-based artist Kris Kashtanova became the first person to file a copyright application for a work that included AI. Her 18-page comic book, "Zarya of the Dawn," was produced using the AI art program Midjourney.

Kashtanova wrote on Instagram that she took the decision to apply to the Copyright Office to "make a case that we do own copyright when we make something using AI." She emphasized that she “was open about how it was made and put Midjourney on the cover page."

Kashtanova described her artwork as AI-assisted rather than created by AI. She claimed to have written the story and designed the layout of the graphic novel, making choices about how to put the images together.

However, she later updated on her social media that the Copyright Office canceled the registration because it failed to recognize that the comic was produced using AI.

The primary character in her book had an obvious resemblance to American actress Zendaya, which made copyrighting the work extremely controversial.

Many AI art programs use images that include celebrity photographs, and AI artists sometimes use celebrity names in their prompts to ensure that characters in a series of images are consistent.

Therefore, the rights of the owner of the images used to train the AI are not clear.

The same concerns prompted photography and stock image provider Getty Images to ban the sale of AI-generated images.

Despite misconceptions, the US Copyright Office has not ruled against copyright on AI artworks. Instead, it ruled out copyright registered to an AI as the author instead of a human.

Frank Rittman, a legal counsel for PitchMark, offers his thoughts below.

The issue is more nuanced than has been reported by the mainstream media so far. The question isn’t whether elements of AI-generated imagery are eligible for copyright protection (they are!); it is instead whether there may have been a procedural concern with the submitted registration document. There’s a “Limitation of Claim” section in the form that requires the applicant to disclose the degree of, or relationship between, the portions of the work attributable to a human being and the portions generated by artificial intelligence. Ms. Kastanova apparently left that section of her application blank and she’s now being given an opportunity to amend it.

But in order to do that, the Copyright Office had to first cancel the registration it had “mistakenly” issued in response to an incorrectly completed application. In other words, old-fashioned human error may be the foundation for the more complicated explanation of what happened. It will be interesting to see what happens next.

PitchMark helps innovators deter idea theft, so that third-parties that they share their idea with get the idea but don’t take it. Visit PitchMark.net and register for free as a PitchMark member today.

Topics

Legal affairs

Categories

Deepfake of Ukraine’s Zelenskyy shows that IP laws governing such tech is urgently needed

Recently, a video featuring a deepfake version of Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy appeared on social media, asking his troops to surrender in the ongoing war with Russia.
The video was quickly identified as a fake, partly due to its poor quality. Zelenskyy also swiftly posted a video of himself exposing the deepfake, and Facebook, YouTube and Twitter announced they had removed the vide

Did Kylie Jenner copy marketing ideas from influencers Brooklyn and Bailey?

Sisters vs. sisters. Media personalities Kylie Jenner and Kourtney Kardashian have come under fire for using marketing tactics for their brands Lemme and Kylie Skin from influencers Brooklyn and Bailey McKnight.
In August, twin sisters Brooklyn and Bailey launched ITK (“in the know”), a 15-piece skincare line available at Walmart, which has been marketed on all their social media accounts.

NFTs are the latest frontier in musicians’ long battle to gain control over their IP

In the music business, the ownership of intellectual property has often been a controversial subject, and that’s all because of the lopsided balance of control. In short, record companies tend to seize most of the control. But that might change, if start-ups pushing ownership models based on non-fungible tokens (NFTs) take off.
In the short amount of time that NFTs have become a trending topic

How Jessica Simpson regained full ownership of her fashion label

Much of the world may still know Jessica Simpson as a 1990s pop star turned reality show personality. But since 2005, she has also been a retail entrepreneur, and a very successful one at that, having steered the Jessica Simpson Collection with different business partners. And now, after years of problems with her most recent licensing partner, she has bought back full ownership of the label that

Lensa app accused of stealing artworks to create online pictures

Australia-based artist Kim Leutwyler has accused the Lensa app of stealing artists' work in order to create artificial intelligence (AI)-based self-portraits and has demanded stringent copyright laws to combat AI-generated art.
The photo and video editor app Lensa recently launched an AI-based feature called "magic avatar" that uses AI to produce stylized portraits of users who upload pictures

Comedian Sarah Silverman and others sue Meta & OpenAI over unauthorized use of their content

Over the past few months, content producers, artists, and publishers have accused Google, OpenAI, Meta, and other AI firms such as Midjourney of utilizing their content to train their models without getting permission from or being compensated for doing so.
Last month, Comedian Sarah Silverman, along with authors Richard Kadrey and Christopher Golden, acting on behalf of unspecified other plain

Let your clients get the idea, without taking it.

PitchMark deters idea theft and provides you with options if it happens.

PitchMark protects the expression of your original concepts, designs, proposals, business plans, creative pitches, music - in short, any idea that you conceived and published, and claim as your own. It gives you peace-of-mind by signalling to whoever you share it with that you are its creator, and that you wish to be respected as such.

If you receive or evaluate ideas or pitches, join PitchMark as a sign of your commitment to respect the Intellectual Property rights of their creators. Attract more in-depth pitches from a wider range of sources. Highlight your PitchMark membership in your Sustainability or CSR Report.